For rescue & due-diligence shops
Rebuild a broken vibe-coded app
on a base that passes due diligence
Exposed keys, non-idempotent webhooks, RLS gaps — you already know the symptoms. Don't patch the loop. Migrate onto a DDD-layered, tested, typed foundation the agent can't re-break.
The AI that built it can’t refactor past its own context window
You know this better than we do: "the AI that built it cannot reliably refactor it because the codebase has outgrown its effective context window." (morphllm) After six months of vibe coding, teams report roughly 40% of the codebase needed rewriting and technical debt up 340%. Patching with the same agent that wrote the debt just adds more of it.
A landing pad that passes the audit you would run yourself
DDD layering, lint-enforced
Domain code cannot import Express, Prisma, or infrastructure — enforced as an ESLint rule, not a guideline. Clear boundaries an agent can operate inside without eroding them.
E2E in CI + typed contracts
Golden-path Playwright flows gate every PR, and a shared typed OpenAPI contract (regenerated and CI-checked) keeps client and server from drifting.
Traceable by design
A durable outbox event bus, plus OpenTelemetry and Sentry, give you the audit trail and operability due diligence looks for.
The security categories you always find open — closed by default
No keys in the client bundle
Secrets live in server-side env, never shipped to the browser — the first thing you grep for on intake.
Idempotent webhooks
Purchases are idempotent on externalOrderId and delivered through a durable outbox — a duplicate webhook can't double-charge.
Sessions that respect a reset
Sessions are server-side rows in Postgres, revocable on demand through BetterAuth; ending concurrent sessions after a credential change is a one-flag switch.
Org-scoped tenant isolation
A tenant-isolation guard returns 404 across organizations — no RLS policy to forget or invert.
One migration beats an invoice-after-invoice patch loop
A rescue that patches symptoms bills again the next time the agent touches the code. Migrating once to a base the agent can't re-break is cheaper for the client and more final for you — and it's a cleaner story to tell an investor than “we keep fixing it.”
A reference stack you can standardize on
If you audit Lovable, Bolt, and Replit apps before funding, you need a trustworthy target to point clients at — a stack you can recommend and standardize on. DDD, tests, typed contracts, an audit-friendly event bus, and observability are exactly the boxes your checklist ticks.
Partner with us
Rescue & agency partnership
We want rescue and due-diligence shops as a channel. Recommend it to the clients you rescue, standardize your rebuilds on one base, and reach out about partnering.
Licensing for client rebuilds
Check the pricing page for current commercial terms before you build a rebuild practice on it.
Rebuild & due-diligence FAQ
Why migrate instead of refactoring the existing app?+
What does “passes due diligence” actually mean here?+
What is the stack?+
Can we partner or resell?+
The rebuild target, not another rescue.
Migrate once to a DDD, tested, typed foundation the agent can't re-break — and pass the audit the first time.